Safeguarding the Vulnerable: India's Online Gaming Bill 2025 and the State's Duty to Protect

The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, passed by both houses of Parliament on August 20-21, 2025, represents a decisive moment in India's digital governance landscape. While this legislation has sparked intense debate about its economic implications, it fundamentally embodies the constitutional principle that the state's primary duty is the welfare of its people, particularly the most vulnerable segments of society.

Understanding the Bill: A Comprehensive Framework

The Online Gaming Bill 2025 establishes a clear regulatory framework that categorizes online gaming into three distinct segments. The legislation promotes e-sports and educational games while implementing a complete prohibition on real money games, regardless of whether they are based on skill, chance, or both.

The bill's key provisions include the establishment of a central gaming authority for oversight and regulation, recognition of e-sports as a legitimate sport with Ministry of Sports support, and severe penalties for violations. Platform operators face up to three years imprisonment and fines up to Rs 1 crore, while celebrity endorsers risk two years imprisonment and penalties up to Rs 50 lakh. The legislation also grants authorities warrant-less search powers and empowers the government to block platforms and related information.

The Societal Impact: A Public Health Crisis

The rationale behind this stringent approach becomes clear when examining the devastating societal impact of online money gaming. Government estimates indicate that approximately 450 million Indians lose around Rs 20,000 crore annually to real money gaming platforms. The human cost extends far beyond financial losses.

Mental Health and Addiction Crisis

Research indicates that gaming addiction prevalence among Indian adolescents ranges between 3.5% to 19.9%, significantly higher than the global average of 1-3%. Studies published in peer-reviewed journals show that 8% of boys and 3% of girls in India suffer from Internet Gaming Disorder. The addiction manifests through preoccupation with gaming, withdrawal symptoms, loss of interest in other activities, and deceitful behavior to hide gaming habits.

Tragic Human Consequences

The most sobering evidence of the crisis lies in the mounting suicide statistics. Tamil Nadu reported 48 suicides linked to online gaming addiction over four years, while Karnataka police records show 32 suicides in just 31 months, with two-thirds occurring in Bengaluru alone. Recent cases highlight the desperation: a 26-year-old Chennai man took his life after using his mother's cancer treatment fund of Rs 30,000 for online rummy, and a 25-year-old in Davanagere ended his life after losing Rs 18 lakh through online gambling.

Vulnerable Populations Disproportionately Affected

The evidence consistently shows that low and middle-income families bear the brunt of gaming-related harm. The financial devastation is particularly acute among vulnerable populations who can least afford such losses. Families have reported taking loans from multiple sources to fund gambling habits, creating debt spirals that destroy household economies. The psychological manipulation through "addictive algorithms" and "manipulative design features" particularly targets those seeking quick financial solutions.

Economic Impact: Balancing Growth and Protection

Critics argue that the bill jeopardizes a thriving industry valued at $3.7 billion, projected to reach $9.1 billion by 2029. The real money gaming sector, which accounts for 86% of industry revenue, faces complete elimination. Industry bodies warn of over 200,000 job losses, closure of 400+ companies, and loss of Rs 25,000 crore in foreign direct investment.

However, these economic arguments must be weighed against the broader societal costs. The legislation preserves and promotes legitimate gaming sectors—e-sports and social gaming—while eliminating the harmful elements that prey on vulnerable populations.

Constitutional Duty and State Responsibility

The Online Gaming Bill aligns with India's constitutional framework, particularly the Directive Principles of State Policy. Article 38 mandates that "the State shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice, social, economic and political, shall inform all the institutions of the national life".

Unlike private entities driven by profit maximization, the state bears the fundamental responsibility for citizen welfare. This duty becomes particularly critical when dealing with products or services that can cause widespread social harm. The gaming industry's business model, heavily dependent on encouraging compulsive behavior and monetary risk-taking, directly conflicts with the state's obligation to protect its most vulnerable citizens.

Learning from Global Public Health Approaches

International research on gambling regulation supports a public health approach that prioritizes harm prevention over industry profits. Studies demonstrate that legal interventions can effectively reduce gambling-related harms when designed with comprehensive understanding of vulnerable populations. The evidence shows that regulation alone is insufficient when dealing with inherently harmful business models designed to exploit psychological vulnerabilities.

The Rationale for Prohibition Over Regulation

IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw articulated the government's position: "It is the government's and parliament's responsibility to take decisive measures against social vices that repeatedly arise". The decision to ban rather than regulate real money games reflects several critical considerations:

Technical and Enforcement Challenges

The bill's explanatory statement notes that the "technical aspects including the very nature of the electronic medium used for online money games, the algorithms applied and the national and transnational networks involved" make complete prohibition more practical than regulation. The cross-border nature of many platforms complicates enforcement of regulatory measures.

National Security Concerns

Government officials cite evidence linking gaming platforms to money laundering, terror financing, and tax evasion. The IT Ministry has highlighted cases where gaming platforms served as communication channels for terrorist organizations. These security considerations support the decision for comprehensive prohibition rather than complex regulatory frameworks.

Industry Arguments and Their Limitations

Industry representatives argue that the legislation fails to distinguish between skill-based games and pure gambling. However, this distinction becomes meaningless when the underlying business model depends on encouraging compulsive monetary risk-taking behavior. Research shows that even skill-based games can trigger addictive behaviors when monetary stakes are involved.

The industry's emphasis on job losses, while concerning, must be contextualized against the broader economic damage caused by gambling addiction. The Rs 20,000 crore annual losses by users, combined with the social costs of addiction, family breakdowns, and lost productivity, likely exceed the direct employment benefits of the industry.

The Path Forward: Supporting Legitimate Gaming

Importantly, the bill does not eliminate gaming entirely. E-sports receives official recognition as a legitimate sport, with the Ministry of Sports tasked with setting guidelines, running awareness campaigns, and supporting training academies. Social and educational games receive government support for registration and promotion.

Prime Minister Modi's endorsement of the legislation emphasizes this balanced approach: "It will encourage e-sports and online social games. At the same time, it will save our society from the harmful effects of online money games".

This framework allows India to develop a globally competitive gaming industry built on skill development, entertainment, and educational value rather than exploitation of psychological vulnerabilities for financial gain.

Conclusion: Duty Fulfilled

The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, represents the state fulfilling its constitutional obligation to protect citizen welfare. While the economic costs are significant, they pale in comparison to the human cost of allowing an industry built on exploitation to continue unchecked.

The state's duty extends beyond merely facilitating economic growth—it encompasses protecting the most vulnerable segments of society from predatory practices. In a nation where low and middle-income families struggle with basic necessities, allowing platforms that systematically extract their limited resources through psychological manipulation represents a fundamental failure of governance.

The bill acknowledges that the duty of the state, unlike private entities, is the welfare of the population, especially the vulnerable. By introducing this legislation, the government has demonstrated its commitment to this principle, choosing the protection of 450 million potential victims over the commercial interests of an industry built on their exploitation.

The path forward involves nurturing legitimate gaming sectors that contribute positively to society while maintaining vigilance against the re-emergence of harmful practices. This approach ensures that India's digital economy serves its people rather than preying upon them—a distinction that defines responsible governance in the 21st century.

Jai Hind
namō namō bhāratāmbē 
namōstu jagatāṃ dhātrī 

mōkṣa mārgaika sētavē